6 COURSE PLANNING AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
A number of different levels of
planning and development are involed in developing a course or set of
instructional materials based on the aims and objectives that have been
estabilished for a language program. In this chapter we will examine the
following dimensions of course development:
- Developing a course rationale
- Describing entry and exit levels
- Choosing course content
- Sequencing course content
- Planning the course content (syllabus and instructional bloks)
- Preparing the scope and sequence plan
These processes do not
necessarily occur in a linear order. Some may take place simultaneousy and many
aspects of a course are subject to ongoing revision each time the course is
taught. The types of decision making that we will examine in this chapter are
also involved in developing instructional materials and many of the example
discussed apply to both course planning and materials design.
The course rationale
A starting point in course
development is a description of the course
rationale. This is a brief written description of the reasons for the
course and the nature of it. The course rationale seeks to answer the following
questions:
Who is this course for ?
What is the course about ?
What kind of teaching and
learning will take place in the course ?
The course rationale answers
these questions by describing the beliefs, values and goal that underlie the
course. It would normally be a two-or there paragraph statement that has been
developed by those involved in planning and teaching a course and that servers
to provide the justification for the type of teaching and learning that will
take place in the course. It provides a succinct statement of the course
philosophy for anyone who may need such information, including students,
teachers, and potential clients. Developing a rationale also helps provide
focus and direction to some of the deliberations involed in course planning.
The rationale thus serves the purposes of:
- Guiding the planning of the various components of the course
- Emphasizing the kinds of teaching and learning the course should exemplity
- Providing a check on the consistency of the various course components in terms of the course values and goals
(posner and
Rudnitsky 1986)
The following is an example of a
course rational :
This course is designed for
working adults who wish to improve their communication skills in English in
order to improve their employment prospects. It teaches the basic communication
skills needed to communicate in a varienty of different work settings. The
course seeks to enable participants to recognize their strength and needs in
language learning and to give them the confidence to use English more
effectively to achieve their own goals. It also seeks to develop the
participants skills in independent learning outside of the classroom.
In order to develop a course
rationale, the course planners need to give careful consideration to the goals
of the course, the kind of teaching and learning they want the course to
exemplity, the roles of teachers of
teacher and learners in the course, and the beliefs and principle the
course will reflect.
Describing the entry and exit level
In order to plan a language
course, it is necessary to know the level at which the program will start and
the level learners may be expected to reach at the end of the course. Language
programs and commercial materials typically distinguish between elementary, intermediate, and advanced levels,
but these categories are too broad for the kind of detailed planning the program
and materials development involves. For these purpose, more detailed descriptions
are needed of students proficiency levels before they enter a program and
targedted proficiency levels at the end of it. Information may be available on
studenst’ entry level from their result on international proficiency tests such
as TOEFL or IELTS. Or specially designed tests may be needed to determine the
level of students’ language skills. Information from proficiency test will
enable the target level of the program to be assessed and may require
adjustment of the program’s objectives if they appear to be aimed at too high
or too low a level.
An approach that has been widely
used in language program planning is to identify different levels of
performance or proficiency in the form of band levels or points on a
proficiency scale. These describe what a student is able to do at different
stages in a language program. An example of the use of proficiency descriptions
in large-scale program planning was the approach used in the Australian Migrant
Education On-Arrival Program.
In order to ensure that a
language program is coherent and systematically moves learners along the path
towards that level of proficiency they require, some overall perspective of the
development path is required. This resulted … in the development of the
Australian Second Languange Proficiency as nine (ASLPR). The ASLPR defines
levels of second language proficiency as nine (potentially 12) points along the
path from zero to native-like proficiency. The definitions provide detailed
descriptions of language behavior on all four macroskill and allow the syllabus
developer to perceive how a course at any levels fits into the total pattern of
proficiency development. (Ingram 1982,66).
Similarly, in 1982 the American
Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages published proficiency guidelines
in the from of “(a) series of descriptions of proficiency levels for speaking,
listening, reading, writing, and culture in a foreign language. These
guidelines represent a graduated sequence of proficiency levels for speaking,
listening, reading, writing, and culture in a foreign language. These
guidelines represent a graduated sequence of steps that can be used to
structure a foreign language program” (Liskin-Gasparro 1984, 11). The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines (see
Appendix 1) have been widely promoted as a framework for organizing curriculum
and as basis for assessment of foreign language ability, though they have also
attracted controversy because they are not research-based (e.g., see Lowe
1986). Band descriptors such as those used in the IELTS examinations or the
URCLES/RSA Certificate in Communicative Skills in English (Weir 1990, 149-179)
can be similarly used as a basis for planning learner entry and exit levels in
a program. (see Appendix 2 for an example of performance levels in writing, and Appendix 3 for band
descriptors for “oral interaction”).
Choosing course content
The question of course content is
probably the most basic issue in course design. Given that a course has to be
developed to address a specific set of need and to cover a given set
objectives, what will the content of the course look like? Decisions about
course content reflect the planners’ assumptions about the nature of language,
language use, and language learning, what the most essential elements or units
of language are, and how these can be organized as an efficient basis for
second language learning. For example, a writing course could potentially be
planned around any of the following types of content:
- Grammar (e.g., using the present tense in descriptions)
- Functions (e.g., describing likes and dislikes)
- Topics (e.g., wiriting about world issues)
- Skills (e.g., developing topic sentences )
- Processes (e.g., using prewriting strategies)
- Texts (e.g., writing a business letter)
Similarly a speaking course could
be organized around:
- Functions (expressing opinions)
- Interaction skills (opening and closing conversations, turn taking)
- Topics (current affairs, business topics)
The choice of a particular
approach to content selection will depend on subject-matter knowledge, the
learners’ proficiency levels, current views on second language learning and
teaching, conventional wisdom, and convenience. Information gathered during
needs analysis contributes to the planning of course content, as do additional
ideas from the following sources:
- Available literature on the topic
- Published materials on the topic
- Review of similar courses offered elsewhere
- Review of tests or exams in the area
- Analysis of students’ problem
- Consultation with teachers familiar with the topic
- Consultation with specialists in the are
Rough initial ideas are noted
down as a basis for planning and added to though group brainstorming. A list of
possible topics, units, skills, and other units of course organization is then
generated. One person suggests something that should go into the course, others
add their ideas, and these are compared with other sources of information until
cleaner ideas about the content of the course are agreed on. Throughout this
process the statements of aims and objectives are continually referred to and
both course content suggestions and the aims and objectives themselves are
revised and fine tuned as the course content is planned. For example, a group of
teachers listed the following initial ideas about what they would include in
course on listening and speaking skills for a group of intermediate-level
learners:
- Asking questions
- Opening and closing conversations
- Expressing opinions
- Dealing with misunderstandings
- Describing experiences
- Social talk
- Telephone skills
- Situation-specific language, such as at a bank
- Describing daily routines
- Recognizing sound contrasts
- Using communication strategies
These topics then have to be
carefully reviewed and refined and the following questions asked about them:
Are all the sugguested topics
necessary?
Have any important topics been
omitted?
Is there sufficient time to cover
them ?
Has sufficient priority been
given to the most important areas ?
Has enough emphasis been put in
the different aspects of the areas identified?
Will the areas covered enable
students to attain the learning outcomes?
Developing initial ideas for
course content often takes place simultaneously with syllabus planning, because
the content of a course will often depend on the type of syllabus framework
that will be used as the basis for the course (discussed later in this chapter)
Determining the scope sequence
Decisions about course content
also need to address the distribution of content throughout the course. This is
known as planning the scope and sequence of the course. Scope is concerned with the breadth and depth of coverage of items
in the course, that is, with the following questions:
What range of content will
covered?
To what extent should each topic
be studied?
For example, In relation to the
course on listening and speaking skills referred to in the preceding section,
one area of potential content identified was “describing experiences.” But how
much will be included in relation to this topic? And should two, or six class
periods be devoted to it? The swquencing of
content in the course also needs to be determined. This involves deciding which
content is needed early in the course and which provides a basis for things
that will be learned later. Sequencing may be based on the following criteria.
Simple to complex
One of the commonest ways of
sequencing material is by difficulty level. Content presented earlier is
thought to be simpler than later items. This is typically seen in relation to
grammar content, but any type of course content can be grade in terms of
difficulty. For example, in a reading course reading text may be simplified at
the beginning of the course and unsimplified at later levels. Or simple skills
such as “literal comprehension” may be required early on, and more complex
skill such as “inferencing” taught at a later stage.
Chonology
Content may be sequenced
according to the order in which evensts occur in the real world. For example,
in a writing course the organization might be based on the sequence writers are
assumed to employ when composing: (1) brainstorming: (2) drafing: (3)revising:
(4) editing. In a proficiency course, mally acquired: (1) listening: (2)
speaking: (3) reading: (4) writing.
Need
Content may be sequenced
according to when learners are more likely to need it outside of the classroom.
For example, the rationale for the sequencing of content in a social survival
curriculum is given as follos:
The topics and cross-topics in
the curriculum are sequenced “in order of importance to students’ lives, ease
of contextualization and their relationship to other topics and cross-topics”.
The sequence is:
- Basic literacy skills
- Personal identification
- Money
- Shopping
- Time and dates
- Telephone
- Health emergencies
- Directions
- Transportation
- Housing
- Post office
- Banking/bills
- Social language
- Clarification
(Mrowicki 1986, xi)
Prerequisite learning
The sequence of content may
reflect what is necessary at one point as a foundation for the next step in the
learning process. For example, a certain set of grammar items may be taught as
a prerequisite to paragraph writing. Or, in a reading course, word attack
skills may be taught early on as a perquisite to reading unsimplified texts at
later stages of the course.
Whole to part or part to whole
In some cases, material at the beginning
of a course may focus on the overall structure or organization of a topic
before considering the individual components that make it up. Alternatively,
the course might focus on practicing the parts before the whole. For example,
students might read short stories and react to them as whole texts before going
on to consider what the elements are that constitute an effective short story.
Or, students might study how to write paragraphs before going on to practice
putting paragraphs together to make an essay.
Spiral sequencing
This approach involves the
recycling of items to ensure that learners have repeated opportunities to learn
them.
Planning the course structure
The next stage in course
development involves mapping the course structure into a from and sequence that
provide a suitable basis for teaching. Some of the premliminary planning
involved will have occurred while ideas for course content were being
generated. Two aspects of this process, however, require more detailed
planning: selecting a syllabus framework and
developing instructional bloks. These
issue are closely related and some times inseparable but also involve different
kinds of decisions.